Home
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
We all are well aware of the situations in Maharashtra & Bihar.
The start was when Maharashtra politician, Mr. Raj Thakerey started campaign against Bihari/North Indians, which was more of a violent stuff than of the type of our national ethics.
It went on for some time, and further as it was going to be a ended affair, the Railways recruitment board exam pushed some air into it.
What happened next was what we all are well aware.
But the Question that hits me again & again: Who is Raj Thakerey? Does the situation makes him the most prominent well wisher of the marathi population?Is he the most prominent supporter of marathi?
Regretfully, it doesn’t seem so.Yes, I am right in my logic.This is not the regionalistic face of a politician.
He is just against people of other regions.When one is full of hatred, how can he be possessing any amount of love & affection.
His statements/activities show that he hates people of other region, it never shows that he loves his own people.
Because it is most simple logic, that a person in love can see the world as a beautiful thing, will love the people who lives in this world.
But the case is different here.He is against humans, may be these humans don’t belong to his family, locality, or state.
This is a story of hatred not love. And according to the law of nature, he will get the same, sooner or later.
Also the same logic supports that this is not regionalism, but it is hatred.
Some more Question arises here: When an outsider/insider tries to destabilize our nation, he is termed as terrorist. Why not in this case, this law is abided by? When Bajrang Dal & other Hindu outfits are banned in the name of such hatred, why not Maharashtra Navnirmaan Sena & Raj Thakerey?
RSS 
But will write against these two for the backwardness of the two states from where they belong to.
These have never uttered any statement against any marathi who is working there.
Let me first wish u for the Deepawali.
And now comes the Qn: If laloo has done something wrong then, are the candidates, who have filled in the application forms & done the toil to crack the paper, responsible?
Consider the case: I & You had fight over some issue, & I get to know that you have one brother younger to you, and one of my friends does harm him. Will this be solution to our personal problem.
Violence is not a solution, it’s only a means to complicate the problem.
Had Mr. Thakerey used the legal way, the things might be a bit better.One PIL had done the thing for the marathi people, but he had to make a bigger issue to show that he is the only well wisher of Marathi people.
This is the statement of a Home Minister from a state who is unable to combat the various underworld gangs.
He justifies an encounter practice by the Mumbai Police, over a youth who could be caught, rather than killed.Will not these incident fuel the ”already reaching extremes” controversy.
Here no Human Rights commission will interfere, this is reality of a democratic nation.
Had it been the the developed state, people of North India would not be in Mumbai in search of employment.
So, the blame comes on the leaders of North India.
Think a case in this consideration:::
A boy is feeling hungry & there is no foodstuff at home. So, he goes to a nearby restaurent, & get himself fed.But he suddenly feels like vomiting & other foodpoisoning related problem.Now, whom to blame for this?
The people at home, who didn’t managed foodstuff for him, or the restaurent which served the poor quality food stuff?
If we go by Mr. Uddhav Thakerey statement, the people at the home should be blamed for the thing.
Yous opinion please.
you gave hit the nail on the head.
Gaurav Kumar
Ritesh